As usual, dawkins always gets pissed off whenever somebody is bringing up religion and especially "god", then he starts being a zealot, he makes his point with a certain arrogance that makes one reluctant to actually follow what's he saying, and 'God' knows (or he knows not, who knows ?) the important of promoting dawkins's work and ideas.
Hi, I yhink I can understand what you are saying. Being an atheist myself, I like best now to describe myself as a humanist. I know atheists who are not humanists and humanists who believe in God. Regards,
Merci pour la mention de ce documentaire. Jusqu'à maintenant j'avais quelques problèmes avec certain propos de Dawkins. Grâce à vous et à ce documentaire je comprends maintenant mieux son intransigeance...
Et je dois dire que je partage son analyse. Ces quelques exemples pour contrer des propos créationnistes sont excellent (création des "races" par croisement, lettres de l'ADN,...).
3 commentaires:
Hi,
As usual, dawkins always gets pissed off whenever somebody is bringing up religion and especially "god", then he starts being a zealot, he makes his point with a certain arrogance that makes one reluctant to actually follow what's he saying, and 'God' knows (or he knows not, who knows ?) the important of promoting dawkins's work and ideas.
Apart from that, great documentary.
Thanks Mr. Baillargeon.
Regards.
Hi,
I yhink I can understand what you are saying. Being an atheist myself, I like best now to describe myself as a humanist.
I know atheists who are not humanists and humanists who believe in God.
Regards,
Normand
Merci pour la mention de ce documentaire.
Jusqu'à maintenant j'avais quelques problèmes avec certain propos de Dawkins. Grâce à vous et à ce documentaire je comprends maintenant mieux son intransigeance...
Et je dois dire que je partage son analyse. Ces quelques exemples pour contrer des propos créationnistes sont excellent (création des "races" par croisement, lettres de l'ADN,...).
Merci beaucoup!
Enregistrer un commentaire